| Feature
Article |
 |
First,
Do No Harm
Philip
Morris makes no public claims about the
efficacy of efforts to produce less
harmful tobacco products. But there are
hints that the R&D program run out
of Richmond could save thousands of
lives.
by
James A. Bacon
Any
Philip Morris USA executive will
tell you that there's no such thing
as a safe cigarette.
But the company is betting its
future on the prospect of one day
creating a cigarette that, if not
exactly safe, is at least less
likely to kill you.
The company has plunked down $350
million to build a state-of-the-art
research center, in effect doubling
a R&D commitment that in
2007 had totaled about $400 million
over the previous decade. It's a
good bet that the people responsible
for investing tens of millions of
dollars a
year, both in company labs and in
sponsored research at universities
around the country, have laid out a
plan detailing the most promising
places to spend the money.
Trouble
is, Philip Morris officials won't
say in any detail what they're
researching. And they're not about
to speculate about how many lives
that research potentially could
save. The company is pushing for
regulatory oversight by the Food and
Drug Administration to establish
standards by which such claims
credibly can be made.
Philip
Morris' research program will
constitute such a huge share of the life
sciences research in the Richmond
region, however, and the prospect
exists that, if successful, so many
lives could be saved, that Greater
Richmond
BioSynthesis was determined to
learn more. And it turns out that
Philip Morris does leave a trail:
It's possible to gather hints about research
priorities from patent filings and employment ads.
In
dissecting Philip Morris' R&D
program, it's
helpful to view research areas
through the prism of the life cycle
of the product -- from the tobacco
leaf to the
cigarette, and then the interaction
of the cigarette smoke with the
human body
on a cellular and molecular level.
|

|
One
potential way to eliminate
hazardous substances from tobacco
may be to alter the genetic
structure of the plant. A necessary
first step: uncovering the genetic
make-up of tobacco. Back in 2003,
Philip Morris advertised a job in
the Bioinformatics Job Forum for a
research associate position in the
field of plant genomics. Said the
job description: "The |
successful candidate will work
interactively with Philip Morris
scientists and company-funded
academic institutions to develop
computational tools that will
facilitate gene discovery and
annotation."
Another
critical stage is the curing
process, which removes moisture from
the tobacco leaf. A Chester, Va.,
company, Star Scientific, Inc., has
invented a patented curing process
that it claims significantly reduces
levels of tobacco-specific
nitrosamines (TSNAs), one of the
more carcinogenic compounds found in
tobacco smoke. Star has developed
two low-TSNA smokeless tobacco
brands that it claims reduce cancer
risk by 90 percent compared to
smoking conventional cigarettes.
Could
Philip Morris be pursuing a similar
strategy? Senior Media Manager Steve
Callahan does confirm that
nitrosamines are one focus of its
research relating to tobacco plants.
"We do a lot of work with
farmers and land grant
universities," he says.
"From seed to barn."
Another
scientific topic that draws
considerable
research attention is the chemical
processes involved with tobacco
combustion. The act of igniting and
burning the cigarette creates
compounds that do not reside in the
tobacco leaf. The result is, in the
words of tobacco researcher Jonathan Foulds, "an
unavoidably toxic
cocktail."
|

|
One
way to avoid creating those
compounds is to avoid burning
the tobacco. Earlier
in the decade, Philip Morris
experimented with heating the
tobacco, rather than burning it |
in such a way as to release
the flavors that smokers craved.
But the hand-held, electrical
heating device, packaged under the
name Accord, didn't appeal to
smokers.
Another
product of combustion is carbon
monoxide, a molecule that binds with
red blood cells, replacing oxygen in
the blood. The gas, which is fatal
in large quantities, is believed to
be a significant contributor to
heart disease and lung disorders. Philip Morris has
racked up a number of patents that
attack the carbon-monoxide problem. One process would use
chemical catalysts that convert
carbon monoxide into harmless carbon
dioxide.
Another
research strategy is to use nano-scale
filters to block harmful substances
from being inhaled. Philip Morris
has filed patents on technologies
that can remove smoke components
such as aldehydes, furans, pyrroles,
aromatics and ketones. The filters
consist of fibers or particles that
operate at a micro-scale, as small
as one to 50 micrometers in
diameter.
Of
particular interest are nano-composite
copper-ceria catalysts that are
useful for catalyzing chemicals at
near ambient-air temperatures. As a
bonus, these
catalysts, says the patent filing,
have potential applications outside
the tobacco industry. The patent
filing lists "vehicle exhaust
emission systems of automobiles and
diesel engines, cold starting of
automobile engines, fuel cells,
lasers, hydrocarbon conversion
reactors, air filters for the
conversion of carbon monoxide and/or
indoor volatile organic compounds,
and smoking articles."
Another
plan of attack is to probe what
happens when smoke is
inhaled into the lungs and chemicals
are absorbed
into the blood stream. Philip Morris
donated $25 million to the
University of Virginia to gain,
among other things, "a clearer
understanding of the molecular level
of the genesis and progression of
diseases associated with
smoking." UVA President John
Casteen elaborated:
Faculty
researchers here are engaged in
ground-breaking molecular research
aimed at identifying the genes
that make certain people
susceptible to chemical and
nicotine dependencies, and others
apparently not susceptible, and at developing medical-imaging
techniques to enhance medical
understanding of smoking-related
illnesses.
In
more molecular-level research,
Philip
Morris scientists are working to
identify key constituents of tobacco
smoke that contribute to oxidative
stress -- a phenomenon caused by
highly reactive molecules known as
free radicals. One 2007 job posting
described a staff position
that would "conduct research on
the role of oxidative stress, cell
injury/death ... and
antioxidant-related signaling
processes in tobacco use-related
cancer."
A
senior geneticist position, also
advertised in 2007, would lead a
team of genetic scientists to
investigate "complex chronic
diseases with the goal of reducing
the risk and harm associated with
cigarette smoke and other
products."
Apparently, research
into tobacco-related disease
processes can boost efforts to fight
cancer. An article in a
periodical published last year by the American
Association for Cancer Research
described a means for
identifying the genes in a tumor
that allow it to evade the body's
natural defenses. Said an
investigator from the University of
Southern California: "The
implication is that once you know
the mechanism by which tumors evade
the immune system, you can match
that tumor to available
therapies." Philip Morris
helped fund the research.
Philip
Morris' tobacco division is not set
up to exploit all of the company's
promising discoveries, so it has set
up a unit, Chrysalis Technologies
located in Chesterfield County, to
which it can transfer
intellectual property it could not
otherwise exploit. Chrysalis
generated a flurry of attention in
2005 when it unveiled a hand-held
inhaler, the Aria. The device
delivers drugs to the lungs via a
soft-mist aerosol -- potentially useful for pharmaceuticals that don't
survive the passage through the
stomach in pill form.
While
bits and pieces of information may
surface in the public domain, Philip Morris officials
remain tight-lipped. "We've been exploring several
areas," says spokesman
Callahan. "We
can't make any claims or speculate.
We've got a lot of learning
ahead."
--
February 1, 2008
|